CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN TORTS JURISPRUDENCE

AUTHOR – SHAIK RAFIUNNISA, STUDENT AT DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR LAW COLLEGE, HYDERABAD

Best Citation – SHAIK RAFIUNNISA, CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN TORTS JURISPRUDENCE, ILE LEX TIMES (ILE LT), 1 (1) of 2023, Pg. 1-3, APIS – 3920 – 0040 | ISBN – 978-81-964391-3-2.

Abstract

Apart from great, explanatory theories, Law of Tort come in many ways.   It has a fair amount of common laws.  One significant claim found in various theorists, as well as a number of leading rights theorists that Law of tort develops gradually in such a way to achieve major judicial decisions in various occasions suited to particular cases according to those case laws.   One is never ‘guilty’ of a tort, as that is a term from the criminal law that implies a violation of some societal or state standard.  One who commits a tort is a tort feasor’, the tort feasor is ‘liable’, rather that guilty.  Tort liability means to monetarily reimburse the tort victim for the harm caused by the tort feasor.  Other remedies are also possible, including restitution or injections.  A tort may arise from intentional acts, negligent acts.  The basis of tort law is that people are liable for the consequences of their actions.  Under a most of the tort laws, the injury suffered by the plaintiff does not have to be physical.  Torts may include causing emotional distress or a violation of personal rights. (E.g. the ‘rights to privacy’). The laws of Torts take the outcomes of claim.  

KEYWORDS: Tort feasor, omission, tortuous liability, breach of contract, compensation, unliquidated damages. Lack of consciousness.